Dong of Shame: Rep. DeGraaf, May the Forced Birth Be With You

May 26, 2011 in America The Fucked

I am a very busy lady. I have appointments to keep, shift exchanges at work to track, and even the occasional date. I have to use a calendar because of my awful memory, and it looks like I’m going to have put one more item on my To Do List: Get raped.

We ladies plan for everything else, so it only makes sense for us to also plan for the little inconvenience of having our bodies violated, and be double extra certain we have insurance in the event we get pregnant from the rape and decide to terminate it. At least, that’s the level of planning expected by Kansas Representative Pete DeGraaf ( R )—who also happens to be a man.

In what is rapidly becoming an (unsurprising) trend among Xtian right-wingers, the Kansas State Legislature passed a law to ban insurance companies from offering abortion coverage in their general health plans, except when a woman’s life is at risk. This is clearly a challenge aimed at poor and single-income women. Millions of women in the United States can’t afford health insurance as it is, or are barely able to afford it. How many of them do you think are going to be able to cough up the extra dough to add on the abortion insurance rider? This is yet another attack on all women by a group of people who have determined that their belief in fairy tales somehow makes them morally superior to those around them, giving them the right to force liberty-reducing laws on others.

One section in particular (there are so many) made my blood boil. It made me want to reach for a rusty, nail-laden 2×4 and camp outside DeGraaf’s home for an opportunity to bury it in his big fat melon face.

During the House debate, Rep. Barbara Bollier, a Mission Hills Republican who supports abortion rights, questioned whether women would buy abortion-only policies before they have crises or unwanted pregnancies or are rape victims.

Rep. Pete DeGraaf, a Mulvane Republican who supports the bill, told her: “We do need to plan ahead, don’t we, in life?”

Bollier asked him, “And so women need to plan ahead for issues that they have no control over with a pregnancy?”

DeGraaf drew groans of protest from some House members when he responded, “I have [a] spare tire on my car.”

“I also have life insurance,” he added. “I have a lot of things that I plan ahead for.”

[SOURCE: McPherson Sentinel]

There are so many things wrong with what came out of his mouth, but I will do my best to address them in an organized manner:

  • A spare tire – A SPARE FUCKING TIRE?! Are you out of your ever lovin’ mind? People expect to eventually damage a tire: hit a nail in a construction zone, wear it out, blow it in an accident. That’s why we carry spares: because all three of those things frequently happen, and they are an expected setback of owning a vehicle. Why is an abortion-only policy NOT like a spare tire? Because rape is not an expected or acceptable setback associated with being a woman. “Oh, you’re a woman? Yeah, at some point, you’re going to be raped.” What the fuck?
  • DeGraaf contradicts himself. In one instance he’s saying that women need to prepare for the unexpected. Yet, women who have sought out health insurance, whether through an employer or independently, did exactly that. They acquired MEDICAL insurance, and pregnancy termination is a MEDICAL procedure. So his issues is obviously not that he’s worried about them being prepared; his concern is about whose money is going towards it. “We’d much rather your body be submitted to further violation for an additional nine months while you deal with the physical and emotional trauma of carrying the byproduct of violence. We’d like you to have to make the gut-wrenching decision of whether to care for the infant, while we scoff at any requests for assistance in doing that, or give it up for it to be adopted (hopefully), at which time we will then bitch and moan about our money going to the state to raise the little bastard.”
  • I’m guessing this law also applies to children then? Families will have to buy rape abortion insurance not only just for the adult female in the relationship, but also for any female children they have? I’m sure that’s going to be affordable.

I personally believe women should be prepared to fight, with fists and firearms and any other means necessary, to protect themselves from sexual attacks and other physical harm. However, in the event that someone overpowers and disarms them and violates them in a manner as cruel and iniquitous as rape, I also believe that these women and girls—these daughters, mothers, best friends, sluts, teachers, and pastors wives (and everyone in between)—should not be forced to relive that rape; seeing it over and over again every time they stare at their growing bellies in the mirror or feel the seed of violence kick against their womb. They should not be shamed for wanting to vindicate a wrong, to want to erase the result of a most heinous evil done against them; nor should their sense of self and the right to their bodies be held for ransom at the will of men who live without ever having to worry about their very same freedoms being taken away.

Would you like to give Rep. DeGraaf a piece of your mind? Here’s his contact information, courtesy of his Legislature homepage:

Capitol Office
Phone: 785-296-7693
Email:pete.degraaf@house.ks.gov

Home Information

1545 East 119th
Mulvane, Kansas 67110
Phone: 316-777-0715
Email:petedegraaf@att.net

  • http://wordsmoker.com/members/misslinda/ misslinda

    Aside from everything else that is wrong with this, the insurance industry part of me finds the idea of an abortion policy completely ridiculous. I can imagine some insurance companies offering ROPs (Rape Only Policies), with a “Consensual Sex Exclusion” and the “Short Skirt/Drunk Female Exclusion.” And how will insurers price abortion policies? Will young women have to pay more while women with old, dried up eggs pay less? Do hot chicks present more of a risk because, duh, hot chicks get laid more often? Will women get a Good Fucker Discount if they can demonstrate that they are on the pill? So many insurance questions! This is the most exciting thing to happen in my industry since New York rewrote Insurance Law § 3420, effectively eroding the late notice defense available to insurers under liability policies providing coverage for personal injury and property damage!

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    @ misslinda: What’s going to happen is that there will be boutique shops selling rape insurance riders on other companies’ existing policies. The proprietors of these businesses will make bounty hunters look like Supreme Court Justices.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/blix/ Blix

    @ misslinda:
    I love it when you talk insurance. Is the treatment for this condition covered under my policy? (Have a great holiday all, I’m off for six days. Why am I telling you? I’m telling everyone.)

  • http://wordsmoker.com/members/misslinda/ misslinda

    @ Chillbear Latrigue:

    I know. It’s just that there is so rarely an opportunity for insurance humor that I couldn’t resist trying. Laws like this make me very happy to be aging out of the demographic of women that it is meant to oppress. Unfortunately, once one state demonstrates that these types of laws are feasible, a whole pile of others will follow. And if enough states pass crap like this, or the wave of burdensome requirements for abortions spreads, there is going to be an entire generation of poverty like we’ve never seen before. Basically we’re all fucked, so maybe there’s a group policy we can purchase.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/geodejane/ GeodeJane

    Ducky: Nice work. Thanks.
    Important information shared here. I will help deliver DeGraaf ‘s Dong of Shame by contacting his office and the State offices.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/militantrubberducky/ MilitantRubberDucky

    @ GeodeJane:
    Thank you, Jane. That seems like the only thing we can do, really.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/latterdaylenin/ Latterday Lenin

    “Oh, you watch Jersey Shore? Yeah, sorry, we consider that a pre-existing condition.”

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/dieterthemasseur/ DieterTheMasseur

    In the future, can we have an award ceremony when someone receives the prestigious Dong of Shame? With an open bar? Because seriously, this guy makes me want to drink. a lot.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/militantrubberducky/ MilitantRubberDucky

    @ DieterTheMasseur:
    Yes, but we’ll all need to get this insurance first in the event someone roofies our drinks.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/muskegharpy/ muskegharpy

    Funny how it’s not considered government overreach when the proposed changes to insurance are about denying legal abortions.

    Between this and the rape case in NY, I am feeling like it’s a bad day to be a woman. Excuse me while I hide from the world and watch bad Australian soap operas.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    @ muskegharpy: You make a really good point. If we want government to quit interfering with private businesses, they probably shouldn’t be making decisions like this for them.

    @ DieterTheMasseur: You sound like our department’s awards committee. We act like it’s about recognizing the cops, but we really just want an open bar.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    I firmly believe that insurance companies should cover abortions in the event of rape. . . unless of course the policy holders are illegal immigrants. If an illegal immigrant is raped, then they should be forced to have the baby if they can’t afford an abortion on their own, cause you know, if they weren’t here illegally they wouldn’t be victims. They’d be off getting raped in countries that cover abortions.

    Even if they come here, pay for our ridiculously expensive health insurance, they should still have to pay for a rape-abortion rider (RAR). Because they wouldn’t be able to buy that overpriced policy unless they crossed the moats and fences with their satchel full of insurance premium cash.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/thepish/ The Pish

    Didn’t we settle this whole dispute with Roe v Wade? It’s amazing how politicians just decide to change things just for shock value.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/members/misslinda/ misslinda

    @ The Pish:
    I thought they were changing things to create jobs. Just imagine how many insurance industry jobs this will create!

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    @MRD: When I sent you that photo of my blingeed junk and allowed you to crop out the rest of me and set it against a rather drab living room background, I knew that it would be posted on the internet. Only I believed it would be shown as a reward and not a thing of shame. I hate to say this, but I think I’m starting to regret my decision.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/gerbilsinlove/ gerbilsinlove

    @ Chillbear Latrigue:
    Way to piss off all those anti-anchor-baby activists, Chill.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/gerbilsinlove/ gerbilsinlove

    @ Chillbear Latrigue:
    That dick-jazzled fixture is exactly how I pictured you, so it comes as no surprise. I assume you make sure your plastic ladies are appropriately vajazzled, as well.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/militantrubberducky/ MilitantRubberDucky

    @ Chillbear Latrigue:
    Considering that background was littered with more coke and hookers than Clinton’s limo, a thing of shame was indeed apt.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/latterdaylenin/ Latterday Lenin

    I get that it’s bad and everything, but the Dong of Shame is kind of pretty.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/nodebutante/ NoDebutante

    I suggest a companion law excluding coverage of any medical treatment needed by a man who has been forcibly sodomized by the Dong of Shame, but only if the man’s last name starts with “De” and ends with “Graaf”, unless said man planned ahead and bought a specific policy covering such actions. One can’t be too careful, right?

    What a jackass. Thanks for getting our attention, Ducky!

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/dieterthemasseur/ DieterTheMasseur

    Latterday Lenin wrote:

    I get that it’s bad and everything, but the Dong of Shame is kind of pretty.

    Many dongs that will ultimately turn out to be regrettable acquaintances are nonetheless very pretty. I have learned this the hard way several times.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/whyamihere/ WhyamIhere?

    @Dieter: Is it possible to learn it the flaccid way?

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/dieterthemasseur/ DieterTheMasseur

    @ WhyamIhere?:
    Regrettably, yes.