The Spectre of the Gun

March 1, 2010 in pew pew pew

A gun. A hammer strikes a cap, which ignites gunpowder, sending a tiny semi-paraboloid chunk of metal hurtling through the air at supersonic speed. The projectile, imparted with tremendous kinetic energy, rips through the air until it spends its energy on an object intercepting its path. Kinetic energy is imparted to the object, along with heat, and an expanding shock wave, whose rate of expansion is dictated by the medium impacted.

A stiffer, hardened medium can absorb the frightening collision, and save for minor surface deformation, repel the projectile; a soft, pliable material shudders and heaves under the absorption of the projectile, as it seeks to bore a hole straight through it. The whole incident, depending on the distance between gun and target, may take less than a second.

A weapon. In the hands of a skilled marksman, deadly at hundreds of yards; for the unskilled, deadly at close range. The hunter can stalk his prey in such a way that it has no chance to understand the danger to it, until the report and then the nearly simultaneous impact. An elk, a caribou, a wolf, a white-tailed deer… none can stand before the power of the gun. The killer can brandish it, and see the fear, before eviscerating his intended target.

An instrument of destruction. Steel forged and bored, shaped and tempered. Gunpowder created, then consumed. The gun consumes energy, turns an explosion into heat and momentum, and a bullet takes an object and wrecks it. Wood. Plastic. Glass. Flesh. Bone.

Guns are a fact of life. The genie cannot be placed back in the bottle. They walk around this world, in the hands of police officers and criminals, soldiers and despots, ordinary citizens and madmen. They serve as offense and defense, deterrent, enforcement, and instrument of power. They enforce the law, and they kill the innocent.

The gun, of itself, is not evil — the intent of the handler is. Put in the capable hand, it is a weapon of sport, of law, of national defense. Put in a monster’s hand, it is a weapon of deceit, destruction, usurpation, and annihilation.

If only it were not so.

The gun has an inherent flaw — it is dependent on the user for purpose. Like any tool, it only does what the operator intends. Yet even so, the gun has but one purpose: destruction. It does not sow seeds. It does not build homes. It does not comfort us in our lonely hours. It does not bring loved ones back from the dead.

The gun has an inherent effect on humans — a false sense of power. The power comes, not from the gun, but from the holder. To hold one in your hand, is to believe that you can do anything, that others can and must do as you wish. It imbues the weak with a sense of strength, that allows them to settle their grievances. It gives the strong a sense of invincibility, that permits them to impose their will upon others. It gives the ordinary person the idea that somehow it will protect them from the bogeymen of the world. All these feelings, however, are false, for the gun does nothing of itself — it only does what it is told.

Pride in the power of a gun is hubris expressed in death. The gun kills or destroys — it can do no less. It has the one purpose, and the purpose is not additive to humanity. It has been put to positive use at times, in promoting freedom, or eradicating oppression, but inevitably, its dark potential pushes someone to an action that costs another person (or group of people) their life. For the measure of freedom and peace it provides, is tempered by the blood it spills and the life it obliterates. The gun can never truly protect, never truly bring peace, as long as it is subject to the dark demons that lurk with all humanity.

While we have the right to own guns, it is perhaps a better measure of our humanity to refuse to use them. It may also be a measure of hubris to believe that one does not need to own a gun to be safe, but isn’t that the point? Do we not, at some point, owe it to ourselves to put the guns down? Are we so naive to believe that humanity will know peace, as long as the dormant but accessible power of the gun lies, like the snake in the Garden of Eden? For any peace is fleeting, where a person picks up a gun and decides that their point of view is more important, because they hold the power of life and death. Even the best of people can be corrupted, for harnessing power requires self-control, and where such control is lacking, the power overwhelms and enthralls, to the point of destruction. Our maturation as a species cannot continue, until we recognize that what we have wrought upon this world, we have wrought upon ourselves. We have created the traps that spring upon us — only we can disarm them.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/rosie-cheeks/ Rosie Cheeks

    i never ever thought i would fire a gun in my life. then i moved onto a rural homestead in the middle of nowhere and soon after my partner had no work. there i was with my three small children (all under 6). i knew no one and i was alone. a stranger in a strange land. that first summer i didn’t even have a dog. i never slept at night. i was so deathly afraid of every sound. i wouldn’t even go downstairs after dark.

    we finally got a dog. this went on and on until finally he bought me a shotgun for christmas. oh honey. just what i always wanted. and i learned to fire it, and the impossible happened. i fired a gun. the kids watched me. they were afraid. and i was glad they were. i was too.

    right before we moved back to the city, two strange men showed up at my front door. my dog didn’t hear them. the door was wide open, only a screen between us. for a split second i thought i was going to die. or something unmentionable in front of my children. fortunately that was not what they were there for. still, i was never so afraid as i was that moment. i cried when they left.

    my thoughts about guns changed that day…though i hear you, and part of me strongly feels the same. i now sit on the fence.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/fifi/ Fifi

    Living in Oklahoma, my friends and I shoot for fun. There is at least one free, public range in each county that is supported by the Fish & Wildlife Service, and we will go there every few months and shoot. It’s not a power thing and we aren’t taking any lives, but it is something to do in a state where there isn’t much to do, and it’s fun. I also fly airplanes in spite of them becoming an instrument of death.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    @NefariousNewt: I thought the description of the process of a shot being fired was artfully done.

    However, I don’t agree with your suggestion that guns – or rather the people wielding them – are destructive. I once shot down a bunch of saplings and large owls at just the right angles until they formed a bridge. Then I crossed it and attacked a rival village. So, I guess that last part was pretty destructive and shooting owls and trees isn’t exactly “green,” but I had all of this extra ammo.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/rosie-cheeks/ Rosie Cheeks

    @ CHILLBEAR and NN…. agreed….the description was quite artful. loved that part.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/ BookishLookish

    Crossbows. Now that’s some badassery.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/militantrubberducky/ MilitantRubberDucky

    @Newt: I really liked this post, even if I do find it a bit idealistic. Our species has been killing and maiming and exerting power over one another for centuries, long before firearms came into the picture. From rocks to samurai swords to nukes, we have found and always will find ways of harming one another, because of all our skills that is the most innate, most visceral, and we are very good at it. Also, I find it necessary to point out that the people that are willing to “put the guns down” are not the people that pick them up to do arbitrary harm to begin with.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/nefariousnewt/ NefariousNewt

    @MILITANTRUBBERDUCKY: Does it matter? It has to start somewhere… with someone who decides not to pick up a rock or a stick or a brick or knife or revolver or an Uzi. It starts when we decide that we’ve had quite enough. I’m not so wholly naive to believe that fingers can be snapped and violence eradicated. But it has to start somewhere, and it has to start soon. We have the capacity to move beyond out instincts, beyond base fears, beyond the demons howling in the dark corners of our minds. Right now, we are at a point where we chose not to harness that power to better ourselves, only better the implements of destruction.

    @CHILLBEARLATRIGUE, @ROSIE CHEEKS: We seldom think of what goes into the firing of a gun — it’s not as simple as you pulling the trigger. It is a complex series of events, which starts before the trigger is pulled. Guns were not something found under a rock, but brought to fruition from the imagination of someone who put disparate ideas together and expanded the range and lethality of killing.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    @Newt: In your response to MRD, you mention instincts, fears and what I assume to mean imagined threats when you refer to “demons,” but none of these things are what motivates me to own a gun (my job aside). I don’t arm myself because I have an instinct to do violence or that I am afraid of some bogey man. I own a gun to protect myself and my family. I can’t do that as effectively without a gun. A properly trained person with a gun has a better chance of surviving an attack from assailant(s) than with any other personal weapon regardless of their weaponry.

    In my department, officers carry non-lethal tasers. They are an effective tool in certain situations, but extremely limited in their use. For instance, they can only be fired once without being reloaded. This poses a significant problem if you have multiple subjects. There are other limitations, but I feel that listing them in a public forum may not be prudent. Suffice it to say that Tasers are far inferior to guns for personal protection.

    You can’t convince me to give up my gun for a movement. I would have to know that EVERYONE else is giving up theirs as well. If even millions of people put down their guns, it will increase the power of those who choose not to. This is demonstrated by the fact that some of the biggest massacres in the history of this country were in environments where the population was not allowed to have guns: Columbine, Virginia Tech, the Amish school in Nickel Mines, PA. Tragically, very few soldiers are armed on a military base. That made Fort Hood vulnerable to an internal threat even if they were secure from outside ones.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lipsticklibrarian/ LipstickLibrarian

    I want to hear William Shatner read this.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/militantrubberducky/ MilitantRubberDucky

    @Newt: What Chill said. As people who work in law enforcement, we see first hand what happens when the only ones with guns are the bad guys; good people get robbed, and killed, and they never stood a chance. You ever notice there is almost no violence in a gun range? Why do you think that is? You’re a lot less likely to start something if you know the other person is just as armed as you are, and may possibly be a better shot. I like your idea of humanity, Newt, and I wish I lived in a world where it existed.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/nefariousnewt/ NefariousNewt

    @LIPSTICKLIBRARIAN: So would I.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/rosie-cheeks/ Rosie Cheeks

    @ Newt….
    last month i was at the Met. there, in the arms and armor room was a brand new glass case that held one of the first Colt revolvers. gold inlay, mahogany, a gift for some turkish king or something…. it was magnificently crafted, a work of art, and i understood the significance of it in the collection.

    as i stood there in a room of armor and swords that had probably seen more bloodshed than i care to think about…i thought….death. this whole room is about death. however, at this point in the evolution of man, sadly, i don’t know if pacifism (?) is an option. war is as old as time. do i think this is just cause for not trying? no. i just fail to have a solution that seems remotely viable.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/nefariousnewt/ NefariousNewt

    @ROSIE CHEEKS: No one said it would be easy. It is never easy to go against conditioning, to go against instinct, to go against the norm. But if we had not, the human race would not be here now. In every age of Mankind, there have always been those who sought to move beyond the norm, to explore new territory, to come up with new ideas, to go against the voices in their head that said they were crazy. Evolution is not just a process of physical transformation, but a process of mental transformation as well. Given our capacity for reason, given our ability to see beyond the now, and given the inner desire to change and grow, we have it within ourselves to take the next small step in our evolution — moving beyond the need for conflict. As always, it will start small, with just a few, but as evolution goes, as time passes, a few will become a few more, and more still.

    I just wish I could live in the world that will be, not the world as it is, but I know that the world that will be will not come about without some sacrifice in the here-and-now. And so I have planted a seed, and perhaps, I can make it grow…

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    @Newt: I know this and the video has been posted ad nauseaum, but I think it applies to your last comment.

    “You know what the fellow said – in Italy, for thirty years under the Borgias, they had warfare, terror, murder and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance. In Switzerland, they had brotherly love, they had five hundred years of democracy and peace – and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock.”

    Our violent tendencies has inspired us to create, develop and build. The objectives may not have been noble, but they moved us forward nonetheless.

    Here is the video link:

    For some reason, I’m incapable of posting videos in comments. If one of you can help me with this, send me a message here or to my email. Thanks.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/voxpopuli/ VoxPopuli

    Guns really scare the crap out of me and I hope to never fire one. I have had one pointed at me and it was horrible and an overall not good experience that I won’t go into here.

    On the other hand, here is some underwater gun porn.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/nefariousnewt/ NefariousNewt

    @CHILLBEARLATRIGUE: It’s safe to say that the creativity of some during times of strife has little to do with the strife, itself. And I happen to like cuckoo clocks.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    @NEFARIOUSNEWT: Look, no one is riding down the cuckoo clock. Like most of my 40-year-old friends, I have a rather impressive collection. You won’t find a more cuckoo clock friendly neighborhood than mine outside of Zurich. I don’t entirely agree with your statement.

    To name a few things:

    The US and USSR space programs were built on the sweat of Nazi V-2 rocket scientists. The space program later yielded hundreds if not thousands of commercial products including cellular technology.

    Bell Labs in conjunction with a small company named mPhase are using nanotechnology to produce batteries that are hundreds of times more efficient. What started the project? SDI satellites require reliable batteries that can hold a charge for decades and then deliver a tremendous burst of energy.

    Nuclear power was the result of us seeking nuclear weapons (much like the Iranians.)

    My final point is that if we didn’t have guns this country would have been overrun by buffalos. Ever try to kill a buffalo without a gun, Newt?

    Fin

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/nefariousnewt/ NefariousNewt

    @CHILLBEARLATRIGUE: The problem with your theory, is that eventually we will push the technology past the limit of our control, and effectively, our technology will kill us off, because we will not have the social capacity to deal with it. We’re already riding that line right now. It started with nuclear weapons, things so horrible that they were supposed to end war altogether, though as we see, Mankind is perfectly capable of continuing to make war without its biggest toys.

    Without social development, technological development becomes unbridled, to the point that we will develop things that on their surface look harmless, but prove deadly, not just to a few, but to billions. Inevitably, someone will push a boundary, or attempt something that should be best left alone, or fail to see the ramifications of their work, until it is too late. Unless we stop… stop the madness, stop the head-long rush forward, stop dissecting and cataloging each other. I want human society to evolve, not have it try to re-grow upon the ashes of previous failure. Call me an idealist, but I’d rather strive toward the betterment of man, than continue to sink into the mire that is human society right now.