Everybody’s Doo-oo-in’ The Wrap-a-round…Now!

December 30, 2009 in Obama, Politics, Rahm Emanuel

Have you heard about The Wraparound, the hottest dance for your politically-cognizant fancy-pants?

Guess what? You just did!

Here’s the deal: The corporate capture of Washington, D.C. has gotten so bad that left-wingers like online organizer Jane Hamsher and progressive economist Dean Baker are now finding common cause with the likes of Randian moron Grover Norquist and Phyllis “I hate gays” Schlafly. I am seriously not making this up!

Earlier this week, Jane Hamsher and Grover Norquist sent a letter to the Attorney General, President Barack Obama’s buddy Eric Holder, demanding the resignation(!) of Obama’s chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. Why? Because of his outside-of-the-criminal-code-of-most-western-nations-incomprehensible activities as a member of the board of Freddie Mac earlier in this still-extant decade I like to call “the holes.”

This is real, people. Even Hamsher-disliking blogs acknowledge a “kernel of truth” in the Hamsher-Norquist allegations of self-dealing and, indeed, money-laundering at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the government-sponsored entities that now apparently have an unlimited line of credit thanks to you and me.

The nut of the Hamsher-Norquist complaint is that this apparently infinite Fannie/Freddie claim on the U.S. taxpayer is a “backdoor TARP” that will be used to pass along funds to the giant banks, e.g., Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, that created the current financial crisis but still have bad mortgages on their books and that would face extraordinary political resistance to further bailouts.

The increasingly sleazy Obama administration’s Christmas Eve news dump is a pretty good indication that this is, in fact, the goal here.

Your tax dollars at work!


  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/mama-penguino-2-2-2/ Mama Penguino

    My cousin used to work at BoA and she called it Bank of Apartheid.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/ BookishLookish

    Politics/strange bedfellows. But if Jane Hamsher and Phyllis Schlafly have to get in bed together, I hope Jane will at least give Phil a good fisting.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/nefariousnewt/ NefariousNewt

    They are trying to take on “The Rahminator?” Good luck.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lawyergay/ lawyergay

    Newt: I may be just another naive liberal from the People’s Republic of Massachusetts, but I honestly think this could spell the end of Rahm’s seat at the foot of our God-King Obama. It all depends on how/when/whether the mainstream media picks up on it.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lawyergay/ lawyergay

    I don’t think I’ve made myself clear in the above post.

    That Jane Hamsher and Grover Norquist would sign the same letter is the equivalent of me making out with Chillbear on top of a pyramid of k.d. lang impersonators, most of whom are naked, oiled, and probably female.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/sfbirdie/ sfbirdie

    I have a hard time believing Obama and his peeps will let this get into any mainstream media. Call it Rapid Hope Loss, if you will, but Obama’s not gonna let his Rahm go down, unless there’s decent enough spin to keep it from tainting the entire administration.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/baroness/ Baroness

    LawyerGay, I adore you, but you’re leaving out the important part of this: that before the crucial vote, it was Rahm who was the hammer-man and enforcer to make sure the PUBLIC OPTION was killed, dead and buried before the vote. Supposedly to ensure passage that would cause minimum discomfort to entrenched interests.

    I’m sorry, but this is way too important to leave out. Killing the public option is WHY progressives felt so betrayed, after 700 other concessions, giving up public option for this…hugely imperfect thing that will send tens of millions right into the “health care” insurers arms. The insurers have got everything they wanted, and give up nothing.

    Mandates for poor people- or every uninsured citizen- to buy insurance from for-profit corporations, with minimal gov’t protections for themselves? When they couldn’t afford it in the first place? Spare me the “tax breaks” vague promises of assistance, this “health” bill is just a fucking dog , a massive gift to the insurance companies. And this is what Obama and Rahm pushed through- they killed the public option purposefully, and we need to face that.

    Imagine trying to force poor people in Appalachia or the Bronx or Oxnard, to buy a private product from a private corporation- where is that in the Constitution? Tithing, 8% of their meagre income? To be forced to buy something from an uncompetitive monopoly? Unheard of! Don’t tell me about MA’s baby pilot program, try wrangling those Southerners. Basically, this bill of Obama’s really will force people to buy into something they don’t want, can’t afford, at the absolute mercy of insurance companies. It is a Teabagger’s dream or nightmare, and it is Constititionally unenforceable.

    And there really will be a bloodbath for Dems and Progressives next year and 2012, I am very sorry to say. This health care bill stinks, will be a nightmare to enact in reality, does not fucking much for the uninsured, does a bonanza for insurance companies.

    Giving up single payer off the bat was a mistake. Giving up public option is a tragedy. Forcing people to buy shitty insurance from empowered companies with massive, massive loopholes is a disaster. Jane Hamsher- I don’t approve her tactics, she’s empowering opponents- but Obama already gave them plenty to work with. This bill will be a nightmare, and you will not believe the fights to come over it. I’m pretty damned dissillusioned too, Obama gave away the store before he got to the table. We radically needed a new plan, and if anything, Obama is too conscious of his place in history to do anything too radical. Which is a pity.
    Sorry for going on. Dismal weather ahead with this, though.

    Don’t blame Jane Hamsher – she’s quite right to name and blame, and Rahm Emanuel is no angel, nor does he give a damn about technicalities. Obama’s team wants this put through so they can say they did. But for ordinary Americans, it’s the pits. It’s a penalty tax for being alive, and being forced to tithe to a corporation. Will not stand, unconstitutional, a guarantee of revolt and electoral consequences. Betraying your base so quickly? Yeah, i feel like sitting out 2012 right now.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    @LawyerGay: You alluded to this earlier in the week. We have now somehow become political allies. Since I know that you aren’t a fan of my commenting without reading your links I will just say,

    this still-extant decade I like to call “the holes.”

    if you came up with that, it’s genius. The holes.

    I’ll go through the links when I have the ability to focus, which I currently do not. Glad to see you back in the mix, though.

    @Baroness: I realize that we have widely different views on what healthcare should be, but I’m in full agreement with what you are describing. The politicians have decided that it’s more important to pass (or block depending on the letter after their name) a bill, rather than create genuine reform. The tactics being employed on both sides are reprehensible.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lipsticklibrarian/ LipstickLibrarian

    SFB: Oh, I’d let Rahm go down.

    Okay, back to your serious politics.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    @LG: You remember that? We drove around all night looking for k.d. lang impersonators, but when we finally got enough to make the pyramid, they kept whining about it being uncomfortable and not being able to breathe. Wait, did you say “make out?” You told me we were going to drink jello shots.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/bjonston/ BJonston

    Wait. What?

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/blix/ Blix

    BJ: No need to question. We now have perfect Christmas gift thank you cards.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lawyergay/ lawyergay

    Baroness: Thanks for the background. I like to think Hamsher would have gone after Rahm regardless of the godawful health care bill, but I think you’re right. She was fucking pissed off, and rightly so, after the senate vote on health care. I wasn’t trying to slam her in this post. I applaud what she’s doing and just gave Dennis Kucinich, who’s spearheading this Fannie/Freddie investigation in congress, $50. I just thought it was noteworthy that our government is now so utterly corrupt that it’s bringing these strange political bedfellows together.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lawyergay/ lawyergay

    Baroness: Just reread your comment. We totally agree on all of the above. I never meant to imply that I disapproved of Hamsher’s tactics, which I find to be brilliant and honest and admirable. She’s a take-no-prisoners honest-to-god ball-buster and a muckraker and God knows I love her for it. I left out the capitulation to health insurers by Congress background because I wanted to be succinct with my wonder at the Hamsher-Norquist alliance on this Xmas Eve Fannie/Freddie giveaway, which Hamsher rightly calls a slush fund. It’s just frankly unbelievable what’s going on in Congress right now.

    Just another quick comment to say: I’m with you, sister.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/baroness/ Baroness

    Dear Lawyergay: I was so hammered when I typed all that last night- serious Dottie Parker blackout there- I actually woke up today unsure where i wrote it. God damn it, where did I misplace that thousand-word essay I wrote last night? I vaguely recall defending Jane Hamsher to an unseemly degree..

    Happy that I wasn’t too undiplomatic- I cringe to re-read my own writing, but your kind response indicates maybe I wasn’t too bad. May I say i adore you LawyerGay? You’re so smart, and the topics you bring up always engage me, issues of the day. You’ve a big heart I think, you care about social issues, day to day i think your read the same things I do. If I ever seem argumentative (bwahaha) plz forgive, it’s more parsing the same points, I think. Talking, thinking aloud. Love that with you Lawyergay, I appreciate you so much, comrade. ;)
    Happy New Year, love.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/chillbearlatrigue/ Chillbear Latrigue

    “I appreciate you so much, comrade.”

    “Comrade?” This is why I keep lobbying to bring back McCarthyism. Or it’s friendlier, stylish companion: Latrigueism.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lawyergay/ lawyergay

    Baroness: Awww, shucks! Right back at ya, btw. I don’t know if you’re on Facebook, but you should be, and you should be my friend. I don’t know, but I’m guessing “Baron Ness” is probably not taken. And if it is, then might I recommend “Bar O’Ness”?