5 Minute Book Review (Part 1): Infinite Jest

July 6, 2009 in 5 Minute Book Review

David Foster Wallace

For anyone who hasn’t read it, stop reading this ridiculous review and go buy it. I’ll wait.

—–

Ok. Everyone else, gather round, let me tell you my story about DFW and IJ.

(There will be spoilers, so if you haven’t read it, please know that.)

First off. This is quite the book. At 1,078 pages, including voluminous footnotes, it’s an undertaking. I have been eyeing this book for more years than I care to count, but have always been intimidated, too busy, reading something else; essentially, I’ve always come up with a reasonable excuse to not read it.

Well. DFW took his life. He took his life very near to the anniversary of my brother taking his life. So his suicide had a very, very relevant impact on me. I did a lot of soul searching and thinking about how bad things must be for someone to consider taking their life. Shit must be pretty heavy. I vowed to read this book that had always intimidated me. It’s quite possibly the best book I’ve ever read, in that it took me a very long time to finish it, and it frustrated the hell out of me, but as soon as I finished it, I wanted to start reading it again.

The book has a number of themes, and I plan to put this out in pieces with one thematic emphasis per entry. I’m hoping a lively discussion ensues.

The best review of the book I could find online was this one from Time magazine in 2005 writing up the best English-language novels:

“The title is a sly wink at the book’s massive girth—it’s 1,000-plus pages in most editions—but the reference to Hamlet is well-earned; moreover, it’s a damn funny book. The action takes place in Boston at two separate but curiously similar venues—an elite tennis academy and a drug rehabilitation facility—in a near future in which calendar years are available for corporate sponsorship (the Year of the Trial Size Dove Bar, the Year of the Depend Adult Undergarment, and so on). The plot of Infinite Jest—which revolves around, among other things, a lost, unwatchably beautiful art film and a conspiracy among wheelchair-bound Quebecois secessionists—is decidedly secondary to the painfully funny dialogue and Wallace’s endlessly rich ruminations and speculations on addiction, entertainment, art, life and, of course, tennis.—L.G” (Lev Grossman).

to be continued…


  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/viruswithshoes/ VirusWithShoes

    I haven’t read this, but I’ll be damned if it will stop me making a comment on it.

    It sounds good!

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/belltolls/ Belltolls

    It’s quite possibly the best book I’ve ever read as well. A friend was reading it at the same time I was and we would get together at coffee houses to talk about it and LAUGH. It was like our reading it had confirmed us into a some sort of club.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lawyergay/ lawyergay

    I read Infinite Jest during a wretched trip to Miami during spring break my third year in law school. It’s not an exaggeration to say that it kept me from going crazy down there.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lipsticklibrarian/ LipstickLibrarian

    I’ve tried to read DFW, but just can’t get past the goddamn footnotes (one of my literary pet peeves, along with heavy dialects and dialogue without quotation marks).

    This tickles me, though:

    I’m hoping a lively discussion ensues.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/fracturedacetabulum/ FracturedAcetabulum

    @VWS: comment away. Just talk about tennis, suicide, addiction; everyone will assume you read it.

    @bell: I wish I had read it at the same time as someone else, but alas I tackled it on my own. I started taking notes near the end, but I should’ve started from the beginning.

    @LG: wow.

    @LL: His style certainly isn’t for all. As for the discussion, read the book real quick and you can make it livelier!

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/samuraipandapoetry/ samuraipandapoetry

    This is indeed the best book I’ve ever read. It is not, however, the best book I’ve ever finished reading because, well, I’ve yet to finish it. I was about a quarter of the way through when I decided writing in my own endeavor should take that time (as Infinite Jest does indeed require a mass amount of time).

    I’m eager to get back into, though, but it’s so hard to juggle with everything else. The parts I’ve read have stayed with me like no other.

    It was also the article in Rolling Stone about DFW’s death last year that inspired me to finally pick up the novel.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lipsticklibrarian/ LipstickLibrarian

    @FA: I think I’ll give it another shot, replace Anna Karenina as my “challenging, can’t sleep” read.

    @SPP: That article, and a few others, really hit close to home. I’ve never heard a description of depression that mirrored my own.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/lawyergay/ lawyergay

    I think it helps to think of the footnotes as “riffs” or even a weird kind of stream-of-consciousness prose poem as opposed to something that needs to be closely read. Either that or skip them.

  • http://wordsmoker.com/help/members-3/samuraipandapoetry/ samuraipandapoetry

    LL: Ditto. Towards the end of the article, where it describes his love for his dogs and how his wife/girlfriend/whatever-she-was-i-can’t-remember says that she knew, she absolutely knew he said goodbye to those dogs, and his leaving them probably pained him the most had me in sobs. I just read in an issue from late May that the article received some kind of journalistic award. Well awarded indeed.

    LG: In the quarter of the novel I completed, I found the footnotes absolutely necessary. Tedious at first, sure, but integral to the story. I, on the other hand, am the kind of jackass that stays through the end credits of a film because, I rationalize, it is still a part of the movie.