5 Second Movie Review: Slumdog Millionaire
By korainhell
Published: February 22, 2009
Published: February 22, 2009
Oliver! in India
trite love story + thin stereotypical characters + rags to riches plot = feel good family fun!
+
cute street urchin + oversaturated color + third world culture = poverty exotica!
=
best picture oscar!
He wins because he is cute and likable and deserving. It is fate.


That about sums up my own assessment. Great review, except for two things:
1. That was more like 15 seconds than 5.
2. Why “deserving”?
I haven’t seen the movie but I am currently reading the book.
I’d like to see it win because the plot is completely improbable here but in India, authorities (the police) are brutal to the poor, they regularly accept bribes, they bully, and torture is real. Who you are means more than anything else and usually, it decides your destiny forever.
I hope the movie opens up the eyes of Westerners to a reality that is outside their imagination (mine). Movies often do that. Books always do.
I think that’s why it is so richly deserved.
I wouldn’t want to visit the slums of Asia. I know I wouldn’t. I just couldn’t do it.
Hippity with the stopwatch: “Oliver in India” is my 2 second review. The rest is a victory lap.
Pinekatz: Checkout the article in this week’s New Yorker for a more eye-opening picture of kids in India’s slums.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/02/23/090223fa_fact_boo
We have to minimize everything good! Everything sucks! Wheee!
Is watching this movie going to help me with the Windstream customer support tech in Mumbai?
Mine would have just been LATIKAAAAAAAAAA! Admittedly, not much good for anyone who’d not seen the film, or Seacrest, who can’t just pronounce those funny Indian names.
@ADismalScience: No one is telling you what you should write.